<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quaker burial ground, Bishophill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yorkstories.co.uk/quaker-burial-ground-bishophill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yorkstories.co.uk/quaker-burial-ground-bishophill/</link>
	<description>A resident&#039;s record of York and its changes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 17:45:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Keith</title>
		<link>http://yorkstories.co.uk/quaker-burial-ground-bishophill/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Keith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Just re-read this piece after reading the Sessions&#8217;  &#8220;Tukes of York&#8221; in which there is an interesting account of the early battles over these headstones. Many Quakers believed even stones such as these were too ostentatious  and William Tuke was particularly enthusiatic in upholding a Yearly Meeting ruling that all stones should be removed. It was only later in 1850 that the ruling was relented and the modest stones reappeared including ironically one for William Tuke some 30 years after his death. The Sessions&#8217; book (published first in 1971) records 32 headstones remaining. A nineteenth century plan notes the position of 150 named graves with other areas known to contain many unknown graves.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just re-read this piece after reading the Sessions&#8217;  &#8220;Tukes of York&#8221; in which there is an interesting account of the early battles over these headstones. Many Quakers believed even stones such as these were too ostentatious  and William Tuke was particularly enthusiatic in upholding a Yearly Meeting ruling that all stones should be removed. It was only later in 1850 that the ruling was relented and the modest stones reappeared including ironically one for William Tuke some 30 years after his death. The Sessions&#8217; book (published first in 1971) records 32 headstones remaining. A nineteenth century plan notes the position of 150 named graves with other areas known to contain many unknown graves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
