<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: King&#8217;s Square petition: Michelle Wyatt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yorkstories.co.uk/kings-square-petition-council-michelle-wyatt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yorkstories.co.uk/kings-square-petition-council-michelle-wyatt/</link>
	<description>A resident&#039;s record of York and its changes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 17:45:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Wyatt</title>
		<link>http://yorkstories.co.uk/kings-square-petition-council-michelle-wyatt/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle Wyatt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 18:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yorkstories.co.uk/?p=3067#comment-2629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kings Square 3 min public comment starts at 13min 40 seconds into the video. The debate on it was 30 min later and lasted for approx 30 min.
The outcome I experienced was that all the conservatives were in favour and all labour against. To me this showed a lack of ability to express individual opinions which could be why our wishes arent being understood and debated clearly. Towards the end it descended into a point scorring battle of wits where only extremities were being given rather than practical, middle ground, realistic and plausible, constructive (hand me a thesaurus!) discussion.
I believe the solution to this is for at the begining of the debate 1 labour stands up giving the party position. Then one conservative gives the party position. Then the remaining 4-5 people give individual non party line discussion. In this way both the labour and conservative can get thier attack in but more than 2 positions/viewpoints can be presented. If I could I would do a 3min talk on this!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kings Square 3 min public comment starts at 13min 40 seconds into the video. The debate on it was 30 min later and lasted for approx 30 min.<br />
The outcome I experienced was that all the conservatives were in favour and all labour against. To me this showed a lack of ability to express individual opinions which could be why our wishes arent being understood and debated clearly. Towards the end it descended into a point scorring battle of wits where only extremities were being given rather than practical, middle ground, realistic and plausible, constructive (hand me a thesaurus!) discussion.<br />
I believe the solution to this is for at the begining of the debate 1 labour stands up giving the party position. Then one conservative gives the party position. Then the remaining 4-5 people give individual non party line discussion. In this way both the labour and conservative can get thier attack in but more than 2 positions/viewpoints can be presented. If I could I would do a 3min talk on this!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
