I don’t think that it’s a case of people being concerned about the change of use of the building. It’s more of a case of what may happen in the future when /if the new owners decide to move on and sell the building. We only have to look at the situation with Trinity Chapel on Clifford Street: which you featured back in October/December 2015 and the developers original plans which would have almost completely erased any vestige of the original chapel. This place is part of our recent past, our known history: even though as individuals, we’ve taken for granted that it will always be there, we’d bloody well miss it and bemoan its’ disappearance, should it ever be ‘renovated; re-modelled;’ or just plain old, knocked down.